NFL Lineup Review/Breakdown Week 16

Take your daily fantasy game to the next level.
Login Register

Here is the Week 16 thread to post your NFL Lineups for the pros.

8 years ago

Hey guys. I have three cash lineups for H2H. How do they look? Is there a standout? Any red flags? Thanks!

8 years ago

Of the three lineups, I like the first the best. You have two of the key cash game pieces in David Johnson and Antonio Brown. I would spin down from A-Rob to possibly Doug Baldwin. I don't love Baldwin's matchup, but he plays a ton of slot, so I think that will aid him if he does draw one of the top two corners for the Rams in coverage. Furthermore, I think he'll be high owned, and fading him could really hurt. I like your Ertz pick on team two better than Tye, and you save money, so I would make that move. Those two moves free up $1,200. I would sink that extra money into moving up from Bilal Powell.

8 years ago

Hey guys. I have two lineups this week. I am only running to this week because I will be busy. The first lineup is Thurs-Sat Cash Game and the second is sun-mon GPP. I used the lineup optimizer for both. The second lineup I used the stacking tool. Not the sure about randle in the second lineup. Since O'dell is out he probably will get some targets.

8 years ago

Hey would love y'all input again, always appreciate the feedback. Playing DK Cash games.

Will only play payne if stewart is held out.

Pivoting from Brown to Hopkins because Baltimore played antonio well last game with help over the top with the secondary (granted it was Vick).

Hopkins is tough bc of qb play but weeden has decent arm strength and may be able to fling a few in his vicinity.

Thoughts?

8 years ago

@pcar I personally am not a fan of two game slates but if your playing in that contest I would use either Rivers or Cousins as my quarterback. I also like Gates more than Reed at tight end. The Eagles are the best team against tight ends and the Raiders one of the worst. I also like the Eagles as the defense. They have stunk up the joint recently and are boom or bust but they have potential. The Redskins are awful on the road and the Eagles have the ability to get a touchdown in the return game. I also like Woodhead or even Brown at running back. For the second lineup I like the Titans as GPP defense if Hoyer is out which is more and more likely. I also am not huge on Randle but he has performed well over the past two games and should see the extra targets.

@rolly I know Wilson is hot but there are better options like Bortles and Big Ben for cheaper in way better match-ups this week. I also would go back to Brown as the only reason why he was stopped was because of Vick. I love Hopkins but not if Weeden is the quarterback which is looking more and more likely. Weeden is awful anyway you put it and the Titans are awful against the run. Not sure I like Payne even with Stewart out. He didn't really do much last game and I don't think you can count on the 34 receiving yards he saw last game. There are better options like Karlos Williams.

8 years ago

@Rollypt in a GPP, making that pivot off of Brown to Hopkins is a fine play, but it's a completely unnecessary risk in cash games. I think David Johnson is also a must in cash games. His price remains low relative to his production, and his ownership rate will be through the roof.

8 years ago

Awesome, thanks for the replies guys.

8 years ago

Your second lineup is very highly owned. Everyone is on Steelers and Jags. This is the exact same lineup at a pay site. So here is the question: In Head to Head games, is it a good strategy to play the favorites with a few different choices to differenciate?

8 years ago

@flip can you please update your user name to remove your email. As far as your question goes in cash games I really do not personally concern myself with ownership levels. There is nothing to be gained by fading a popular player. I plays the plays that I feel have the highest floors. If a player is owned by 80% of the field so be it. Ownership levels concern me more in GPPs where game theory really comes into play.

8 years ago
  • Reply